Ethernet
Applications in Traffic Control
Demand
for Bandwidth Makes Ethernet the Preferred Protocol
A White Paper by Frank Madren, President,
GarrettCom, Inc.
Overview
Video cameras are an attractive new tool for traffic
control and management. Video cameras can provide immediate
full-motion feedback as traffic hotspots unfold, as
well as offer better information for emergency vehicles,
pedestrian and vehicular safety, public security, and
other control and management functions that are the
outgrowth of increasingly congested traffic conditions.
Live video is driving a revolution in traffic control
communications because the data bandwidth required for
video is up to 100 times greater than the capacity of
traditional serial communications lines that typically
run out to the intersections themselves.
The second impact of new higher-bandwidth
technologies is the increased difficulty of getting
the huge flow of data up to the Traffic Operations Center
(TOC). A highly centralized network topology is required
for centralized traffic control operations. Fiber is
the transport medium of choice because it is noise resistant
and can carry data over long distances. A large proportion
of traffic control networks have been designed using
fiber cable and layered switches for connecting multiple
traffic control sites, however the choices of the communications
protocol to run over the fiber lines are broad.
Ethernet is emerging as the protocol of
choice for incorporating video cameras at traffic intersections
and for connecting to cameras monitoring interstate
highway traffic. With the introduction of the new 1
Gigabit (Gb) Ethernet standard over the last couple
of years, it is also a strong contender for carrying
huge amounts of data back to the TOC. The scalable Ethernet
standard encompasses a variety of bandwidths and, with
the unlimited bandwidth capacity of fiber optic media,
promises inexpensive and relatively painless upgrade
paths for systems as traffic control technology evolves.
Communications Protocol 101
A centralized traffic control network topology is comprised
of two major pieces. The edge portion of the network
connects devices in intersections into the intermediate
local collection points. The edge bandwidth, typically
25 to 100 Mb with live video, needs to support one intersection
or a subnet consisting of several intersections. The
backbone portion carries the traffic from intermediate
local collection points to the TOC. Bandwidth is heaviest
here, running from 100 Megabit (Mb) to 1 Gb, and outages
cannot be tolerated.
In both edge and backbone applications,
the traditional practice in traffic control has been
to follow telecommunications' lead. Telecommunications
solutions have focused on serial connections, reliability,
and outdoor-hardened equipment - and these were readily
available. However, as bandwidth demands increase and
options become available that provide both lower cost
and higher performance, trends are moving toward newer
packet-oriented standard solutions.
Fiber, the Preferred Medium
The data transport medium is as critical as the protocol
in creating a reliable system. Backbones do the heavy
hauling, and are almost always fiber-based. Fiber has
emerged as the backbone medium of choice because it
provides unlimited bandwidth and it is relatively immune
to electrical noise, contaminants, and other intrusions
of the outdoors into a communications medium environment.
With a range of 20 Km for 100 Mb standard single-mode
fiber implementations, it provides secure transport
within the typical range of a TOC. Today fiber's distance
capability, noise immunity and reliability are making
it the medium of choice at the edge as well.
Ethernet at the Edge
Voice-grade and T1 serial lines have previously been
the edge protocols of choice for installation at the
intersection for managing traffic lights, pedestrian
crosswalk signals, traffic counters, and other light
duty activities. Today, however, live video and other
new technologies promise more information and more responsive
traffic control - but at the cost of greatly increased
bandwidth. Modems running at 56 Kb and T1 lines running
at 1.544- 3.152 Megabits per second (Mbps) cannot keep
up.

Speed
of common communication services
With more than 80 percent of all
traffic intersections wired for data transmission, traffic
control designers and managers across the nation are
considering upgrades to higher performance communications
systems. Ethernet is the new protocol of choice. Ethernet
has always had both bandwidth and cost advantages over
serial telecommunications lines, however, office-grade
Ethernet products are designed for clean, air-conditioned
environments. The heat, humidity, dirt, and electrical
interference common to traffic control boxes and other
outdoors applications were incompatible with delicate
office systems. As Ethernet's performance and cost advantages
were recognized in other markets, such as telecommunications
and industrial control, new Ethernet boxes hardened
for outdoor use became available. They have metal cases
that are sealed to keep out contaminants, and they use
premium components rated for temperature extremes along
with special thermal design techniques. Combining the
hardy features of the fiber medium with Ethernet product
designs that could withstand extended temperatures and
particulate contamination extended the benefits of Ethernet
to other markets.
Today Ethernet appears to be the
ideal protocol for the particular needs of edge traffic
control systems. Ethernet provides the high bandwidth
necessary to support live video and other applications
that can help manage the overcrowded traffic environments
of this decade. With the emergence of hardened outdoor
Ethernet products, Ethernet is finally practical for
traffic control. Traffic control devices such as cameras,
wireless access units, and Model 2070 Controllers come
with an Ethernet interface built in. Ethernet hardware
is as affordable as T1 equipment, and the fiber optic
media costs the same whether used for Ethernet or for
serial data. In addition, the easy upgrade path as bandwidth
requirements continue to spiral, makes it advantageous
for cost-conscious traffic management planners.
Ethernet in the Backbone
Backbone protocol choices have traditionally been SDH,
SONET and ATM. With the recent introduction of the 1
Gb (1999) and 10 Gb (2002) Ethernet standards, IP data
traffic running over Ethernet now provides the backbone
bandwidth required. In a traffic control network with
video, over 95 percent of the data moves from the edge
to the TOC; very little flows down. Networks based on
IP packets are well suited to this unbalanced load.
In addition, where SDH, SONET and ATM systems normally
are heavily oversubscribed, Ethernet networks can more
readily pass all the data through the backbone, making
an Ethernet-based traffic control network more responsive
under peak activity (i.e. emergency situation) conditions.
Best of all, Ethernet offers a much more attractive
cost structure.

Cost
to Deliver Bandwidth over Time. Source Business Communications
Review
With bandwidth over SDH, SONET or
ATM protocols being metered, per telecommunications
tradition, the price increases as the bandwidth demands
increase. Ethernet's commercial orientation provides
virtually free bandwidth once it is installed. Complexity
is reduced because, with an all-Ethernet network, costly
routers are minimized or eliminated. It is becoming
evident that, unless SONET or ATM is already installed
and paid for, planning for an IP switched Ethernet backbone
is the best strategy for the future.
Government Support for Ethernet
With the emergence of the Department of Transportation's
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) initiative,
there has been increasing focus on interoperability.
With the modern dependence on highways for local and
long haul transportation, and the potential for 20-mile
or longer backups and disasters that can tie up freeways
and surrounding surface streets for hours, traffic management
has to improve.
A recent incident on the Capital Beltway
required coordination among emergency services from
two states and the District of Columbia, and some federal
agencies were involved. Without a basic level of interoperability
to allow services from different jurisdictions to "speak"
to each other, communications snafus added to the mess.
As a part of the ITS initiative,
interoperable Ethernet-ready traffic control devices,
such as the Model 2070 Advanced Traffic Controller,
are emerging. This recognition of Ethernet as a valuable
protocol for traffic control reinforces a trend that
has been gaining momentum for some time.
Emerging from the office environment
in the days when personal computers were connected by
the "Adidas net" (i.e., carrying a floppy
disk from one system to another), Ethernet has over
20 years of practical history in creating and nurturing
a level of interoperability that makes possible the
interconnection of multiple systems from multiple vendors
without a hitch. Ethernet in LANs has swept away ARCnet,
Token Ring, AppleTalk, and ATM. With cost-effective
interoperable equipment readily available from multiple
suppliers, Ethernet is the choice in government networks
today.
As Ethernet has matured, it has become
a valued protocol in the high-availability, high-reliability
telecommunications market. With the introduction of
hardened Ethernet products, Ethernet is rapidly displacing
proprietary protocols in the industrial market as well.
Almost all new industrial controllers are built with
an integral Ethernet port today. Small low-cost serial-to-Ethernet
converters are simplifying the transition from old serial
lines to Industrial Ethernet. Even though bandwidth
requirements are modest, fiber media is dominant in
industrial networks, and the universality of Ethernet
makes it a winner.
It stands to reason that Ethernet
will become the edge protocol of choice in the traffic
control market - and that it will also become a popular
and cost effective backbone protocol as well. It is
time for traffic systems to move out of the telephone
age (serial lines) into the Internet age (IP packet
data).
Sample Implementation: Video
Systems for Traffic Control
Live video offers the capability to provide instant
traffic information for real-time management, but the
data bandwidth required is up to 100 times greater than
the capacity of traditional serial communications lines.
In addition, reliability and redundancy are issues.
In congested traffic conditions, a failure at any intersection
can have widespread repercussions.
To install up to four cameras at
an intersection, allowing complete surveillance of traffic
conditions, requires bandwidth of up to 25 Megabits
per second per intersection. However, the cost would
prove prohibitive using a traditional telecommunications
high-bandwidth solution.
The environment in the traffic control
boxes at intersections requires special hardened communications
equipment to support the operational temperature ranges,
dust and dirt, and fog and humidity to which it would
be exposed in a traffic control box. Outdoor-hardened
Ethernet devices are a preferred solution because the
equipment itself is 10 percent or less of the cost of
the alternatives for the same bandwidth. In addition,
Ethernet provides an upgrade path that promises lower
cost in the future, as well as today.
A sample edge solution is GarrettCom's
new ITS Blade Ethernet switch-on-a-card that
saves space in the tight confines of a traffic control
box, occupying one A1 or A2 peripheral slot inside the
Model 2070 Traffic Control Chassis. It supports up to
six 10/100 copper ports to connect to the Ethernet-ready
video cameras and to the 2070 CPU card and local nodes,
plus two single-mode 100 Mb Ethernet fiber ports built-in
for high bandwidth data transport upstream in the traffic
control network hierarchy. The Model 2070 Controller
connects to the traffic signal lights, traffic counters
and sensors, pedestrian signs and switches. A redundant
mesh of fiber cables and intermediate Ethernet switches
connects the Ethernet card at each intersection with
the TOC.
A Magnum P62F Hardened Switch connects
multiple traffic cameras on a freeway and ties into
the same TOC using a fiber built-in port.

The active hardware in a complete
Ethernet IP-switched network solution is roughly one-half
the cost of a combination T1 and SONET or ATM solution,
and provides about 10X greater bandwidth for the video
data as well.
About GarrettCom, Inc.
GarrettCom, Inc., Fremont, Calif., is a leading provider
of Ethernet products designed to meet the requirements
of specialized markets. Today the company is known for
its broad, modular, highly reliable and cost-effective
lines of Magnum Ethernet LAN products targeted to the
telecommunications and industrial control markets, featuring
fiber ports built-in. In 2002, GarrettCom launched an
initiative to provide Ethernet Outdoors products for
the traffic control and management market, which enable
traffic control designers to take advantage of Ethernet's
strengths and benefits in this market. Working with
Naztec, Inc., Sugar Land, Tex., and others, the company
developed the first board-level product designed to
fit in a peripheral slot of the Ethernet-ready Model
2070 Traffic Controller.
GarrettCom's unique technical background,
which combines experience in the demanding Carrier and
the Industrial Ethernet markets with a pioneering presence
in fiber-built-in Ethernet switches and hubs, gives
the company a strong position from which to create innovative
products for the traffic control market. Ethernet products
for traffic control systems from GarrettCom include
Outdoor Switches, ITS Blade Switches for use in 2070
chassis, Managed Fiber Switches, and Outdoor Media Converters.
GarrettCom markets its products
through a network of resellers, OEMs, system integrators,
and international distributors. For more information
on GarrettCom and its Magnum products for Ethernet Outdoors,
visit www.GarrettCom.com,
or contact the company at 213 Hammond Ave.,
Fremont, CA 94539, telephone 510-438-9071, fax (510)
438-9072, email mktg@garrettcom.com.
Copyright 2002 GarrettCom, Inc. GarrettCom,
Magnum, Magnum Blade, and Personal Switch are trademarks
and Personal Hub is a registered trademark of GarrettCom,
Inc. NEBS is a trademark of Telcordia Technologies.
Ethernet is a trademark of Xerox Corporation. All other
products and/or company names are trademarks of their
respective owners.
Contact us
for more information about Ethernet applications in
traffic control.
Ethernet
Products | Wireless
Communications Products
Wireless Communication
Case Studies | Communications
Glossary & FAQ | Resources
|